.svg)
AI Governance and Compliance Oversight
Cherry Hill Advisory helps organizations build practical governance, controls, and oversight for AI adoption. We work with internal audit, risk, and compliance leaders to assess AI risk, strengthen governance, and support responsible use across the enterprise.
AI adoption is accelerating faster than governance and compliance
Many organizations are already using AI tools across departments, vendors, and workflows. The challenge is that oversight, accountability, and compliance often lag behind implementation.
- Policies may exist, but enforcement and monitoring are inconsistent
- Documentation around AI use, inputs, and decision impact is often limited
- Internal audit teams are being asked to assess AI risk without clear methodology
- Vendor AI capabilities can introduce new third-party risk exposure
A Governance-First Approach to AI Oversight
Cherry Hill Advisory supports internal audit, risk, compliance, and executive stakeholders in building AI governance programs that are practical, scalable, and defensible.
.svg)
AI Governance Framework Development
Build governance structures that define how AI tools are approved, used, monitored, and governed across the organization.
.svg)
AI Compliance Readiness & Risk Alignment
Assess AI governance against internal expectations and evolving external requirements, including emerging U.S. and international frameworks.
.svg)
AI Risk Assessments
Evaluate AI-related risks such as model governance, data integrity, bias, cybersecurity exposure, operational risk, and reputational impact.
.svg)
Control Design & Monitoring
Design and evaluate controls for AI oversight, including documentation standards, approval workflows, monitoring expectations, and accountability.
.svg)
Internal Audit Enablement
Provide internal audit teams with practical frameworks and methodology for evaluating AI governance in a structured and repeatable way.
.svg)
Third-Party AI Risk Oversight
Assess vendor AI use and the risks it introduces, including governance expectations, control gaps, and compliance implications.
How Cherry Hill Helps Internal Audit Govern AI
Internal audit teams need practical ways to evaluate AI risk, establish governance oversight, and audit AI systems as adoption expands across the organization. Cherry Hill Advisory provides the structure, methodology, and practitioner expertise to make that possible.
What you're used to
- AI tools adopted across the organization without a clear governance framework
- Limited visibility into where AI is being used or how decisions are made
- Internal audit teams asked to assess AI risk without a defined audit methodology
- Algorithm bias and model risks not formally evaluated
- Uncertainty around how AI can be used safely within the audit function
- AI governance programs that are not aligned with emerging regulatory expectations
- Structured AI risk assessments and governance frameworks for internal audit oversight
- Algorithm bias and control gap analysis to identify emerging AI risks
- AI use case inventories with defined audit approaches for evaluating AI systems
- Governance aligned with EU AI Act and evolving U.S. regulatory frameworks
- Guidance on leveraging AI to enhance internal audit efficiency
- Practitioner-led methodology for auditing AI systems
Supporting organizations with complex governance requirements
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor.
.png)
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor.
.png)
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor.
Cherry Hill Advisory Is Leading the Conversation on AI
.png)
Build AI governance Before It Becomes a Compliance Issue
If your organization is adopting AI tools and needs clear governance, oversight,
and compliance alignment, we can help.
